Timor-Leste Government Dismisses SERVE.IP's Deputy Executive Director Augusta Antonia Gomes on International Women's Day
- Média Laloran Tasi Mane

- Mar 8, 2025
- 4 min read
Dili, Timor-Leste – March 8, 2025

In an unprecedented and controversial decision, the Government of Timor-Leste dismissed Ms. Augusta Antonia Gomes, the Deputy Director of SERVE, IP, on International Women's Day. The decision, made by the Council of Ministers, marks what appears to be the first recorded case in history where a government has fired its own female employee on a day meant to honor women's achievements and advocate for gender equality.
The case reportedly began with an internal conflict between Augusta and the Executive Director of SERVE regarding bill collection practices undertaken by the Executive Director. Sources indicate that Augusta raised concerns about how bill collections were being handled, which may have contributed to tensions within the leadership of the agency. However, Augusta herself has clarified that while there were disagreements between the Executive Director and Deputy Executive Director, there was no personal issue between her and Mr. Fausto Soares Dias. She emphasized that differences in ideas and perspectives are a normal part of decision-making and can ultimately lead to better outcomes.
A Global First: A Government Dismissing a Woman on International Women's Day
While instances of women facing workplace discrimination and dismissals are not uncommon, Augusta’s case stands out as the first known example of a government formally terminating a female leader on International Women's Day. The symbolism of this decision has sparked criticism, as the day is meant to reinforce women's rights rather than undermine them.
Speaking about her dismissal, Augusta expressed sadness, not just about losing her position, but about what it represents for women in government institutions. She pointed out that women in leadership continue to face psychological pressure from male employees, and their dignity is often undervalued.

"As a woman, I am deeply saddened because the dignity of women is never truly valued. In government institutions, we experience significant psychological pressure from male colleagues," she said. "However, it is important to recognize that women can also contribute to the development of this country."
Timor-Leste has made significant strides in gender inclusion, with relatively high female representation in parliament compared to other Southeast Asian nations. However, structural barriers remain, particularly in executive and decision-making roles. The case of Augusta raises concerns about whether women in government positions are truly secure or if their presence remains vulnerable to abrupt political shifts.
Lack of Response from the Secretary of State for Equality and Inclusion
Despite the significance of this dismissal, there has been no public intervention or statement from the Secretary of State for Equality and Inclusion (SEII)—the institution responsible for promoting gender equality and women’s rights in Timor-Leste.
The SEII, established under Decree-Law No. 17/2019, plays a crucial role in advocating for women’s rights and ensuring their participation in national development. However, its silence on Augusta’s dismissal raises questions about the government’s true stance on gender equality, particularly on a day meant to celebrate women’s contributions.
The absence of a response from the SEII may be interpreted as a lack of institutional support for women in leadership positions, potentially discouraging female participation in governance and public administration. Given that the SEII has previously been active in highlighting Timor-Leste’s progress on gender equality on international platforms, its inaction on a high-profile case within its own government is striking.
Comparison with Similar Cases in Other Countries
This situation is not unique to Timor-Leste. Across the world, women in leadership positions have faced dismissals under contentious circumstances, often tied to internal power struggles or resistance to reform.
Brazil: The Case of Dilma Rousseff (2016)
Brazil’s first female president, Dilma Rousseff, was impeached in what many considered a politically motivated move. While officially dismissed over budgetary manipulations, critics argued that the process was deeply gendered, with many male politicians openly disrespecting her leadership. Despite her removal, Rousseff’s case became a global example of how women in power often face higher scrutiny and political retaliation.
South Korea: The Case of Park Geun-hye (2017)
South Korea’s first female president, Park Geun-hye, was removed from office and later imprisoned due to a corruption scandal. While legal justifications were provided, many supporters argued that her case was pursued with an intensity that male leaders in similar situations had not faced. Despite the controversy, her case led to a broader national reckoning on political transparency and accountability.
Tanzania: The Case of Samia Suluhu Hassan (2021-Present)
Tanzania saw an opposite outcome when Samia Suluhu Hassan took over as president after the sudden death of her predecessor. Initially underestimated by many, she went on to implement major governance reforms, proving that women in leadership can bring about significant change despite challenges.
Political or Administrative Decision?
The Council of Ministers’ role in making this decision indicates that Augusta’s dismissal was not merely an internal administrative matter but a high-level government decision. Some analysts believe this move could be part of broader governance reforms or shifts in political allegiances. However, the lack of official communication on the matter fuels speculation rather than clarity.

"If this was a justified administrative decision, the government should have provided clear reasons," said Augusta. "Transparency is crucial in maintaining public trust, especially when decisions involve high-level personnel."
Moreover, the reported dispute over bill collection raises further concerns about accountability within SERVE. If Augusta’s dismissal was linked to her opposition to questionable financial practices, it would set a troubling precedent for whistleblowers and reform-minded officials within the public sector.
The Road Ahead
Augusta’s dismissal highlights the fragile nature of leadership roles for women in Timor-Leste and the need for stronger institutional protections against arbitrary decisions. Whether this incident will lead to broader discussions on gender equality, workplace security, and financial accountability within government institutions remains to be seen.
For now, the silence from government officials—including the SEII—speaks volumes, leaving many to question whether this decision was merely procedural or if it reflects deeper issues within Timor-Leste’s governance structures. However, if history is any indication, such cases often ignite larger debates about governance, transparency, and the role of women in leadership. What happens next in Timor-Leste will depend on how civil society, political actors, and the public respond to this incident.
Media Laloran Tasi Mane
8 Marco, 2025




Comments